%% newbug.tex 2005/04/17 demonstrates tameflts.sty bug. 
%% (C) 2005 Uwe Lueck http://contact-ednotes.sty.de.vu 
%% 
%% RIGHTS: LaTeX Project Public License (LPPL) v1.3 
%%         -- author-maintained. 
% 
% Remove the next `%' to see the bug (bug? see bottom): 

\documentclass[12pt]{article}

% \usepackage{tameflts}

\nofiles 
\begin{document}

\newcommand{\footnobreakpar}{Test.\footnote{A note.}\par\nobreak}
\footnobreakpar \footnobreakpar \footnobreakpar \footnobreakpar 
\footnobreakpar \footnobreakpar \footnobreakpar \footnobreakpar 
\footnobreakpar \footnobreakpar \footnobreakpar \footnobreakpar 
\footnobreakpar \footnobreakpar \footnobreakpar \footnobreakpar 
\footnobreakpar \footnobreakpar \footnobreakpar
Test.\footnote{A note.} 
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\leavevmode\vrule height 10em 
\end{center}
\caption{An upright stroke.} 
\end{figure}

\newcommand{\testpar}{Test.\par}
\testpar \testpar \testpar \testpar \testpar \testpar 
\testpar \testpar \testpar \testpar \testpar \testpar 
\testpar \testpar \testpar \testpar \testpar 

\enddocument 

REMARKS: 
* Bug? This may be a matter of taste. However, I expect 
  agreement here that it is better to use two pages instead of 
  three (unless the user explicitly demands that the figure goes 
  to its own page). 
* I think the present example is rather artificial. 
* `License' may be funny with a demo file. Yet the part of LPPL 
  on changing/redistributing is useful here especially with the 
  \usepackage line, which should remain commented out for 
  distribution. 

