@article{albarede1984,
  title = {Unscrambling the Lead Model Ages},
  author = {Albar{\`e}de, F. and Juteau, M.},
  year = 1984,
  month = jan,
  journal = {Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta},
  volume = {48},
  number = {1},
  pages = {207--212},
  issn = {00167037},
  doi = {10.1016/0016-7037(84)90364-8},
  langid = {english}
}

@article{albarede2012,
  title = {A {{Geological Perspective}} on the {{Use}} of {{Pb Isotopes}} in {{Archaeometry}}},
  author = {Albar{\`e}de, F. and Desaulty, A.-M. and {Blichert-Toft}, J.},
  year = 2012,
  month = oct,
  journal = {Archaeometry},
  volume = {54},
  number = {5},
  pages = {853--867},
  issn = {0003813X},
  doi = {10.1111/j.1475-4754.2011.00653.x},
  langid = {english}
}

@book{allegre2005,
  title = {{G\'eologie isotopique}},
  author = {All{\`e}gre, Claude},
  year = 2005,
  series = {{Belin sup}},
  publisher = {Belin},
  address = {Paris},
  isbn = {978-2-7011-3493-2},
  langid = {french}
}

@article{boers2017,
  title = {A Complete Representation of Uncertainties in Layer-Counted Paleoclimatic Archives},
  author = {Boers, Niklas and Goswami, Bedartha and Ghil, Michael},
  year = 2017,
  month = sep,
  journal = {Climate of the Past},
  volume = {13},
  number = {9},
  pages = {1169--1180},
  issn = {1814-9332},
  doi = {10.5194/cp-13-1169-2017},
  abstract = {Accurate time series representation of paleoclimatic proxy records is challenging because such records involve dating errors in addition to proxy measurement errors. Rigorous attention is rarely given to age uncertainties in paleoclimatic research, although the latter can severely bias the results of proxy record analysis. Here, we introduce a Bayesian approach to represent layer-counted proxy records -- such as ice cores, sediments, corals, or tree rings -- as sequences of probability distributions on absolute, error-free time axes. The method accounts for both proxy measurement errors and uncertainties arising from layer-counting-based dating of the records. An application to oxygen isotope ratios from the North Greenland Ice Core Project (NGRIP) record reveals that the counting errors, although seemingly small, lead to substantial uncertainties in the final representation of the oxygen isotope ratios. In particular, for the older parts of the NGRIP record, our results show that the total uncertainty originating from dating errors has been seriously underestimated. Our method is next applied to deriving the overall uncertainties of the Suigetsu radiocarbon comparison curve, which was recently obtained from varved sediment cores at Lake Suigetsu, Japan. This curve provides the only terrestrial radiocarbon comparison for the time interval 12.5--52.8\,kyr\,BP. The uncertainties derived here can be readily employed to obtain complete error estimates for arbitrary radiometrically dated proxy records of this recent part of the last glacial interval.},
  langid = {english}
}

@article{bronkramsey2008,
  title = {Radiocarbon {{Dating}}: {{Revolutions}} in {{Understanding}}},
  shorttitle = {Radiocarbon {{Dating}}},
  author = {Bronk Ramsey, C.},
  year = 2008,
  month = apr,
  journal = {Archaeometry},
  volume = {50},
  number = {2},
  pages = {249--275},
  issn = {0003-813X, 1475-4754},
  doi = {10.1111/j.1475-4754.2008.00394.x},
  langid = {english}
}

@article{bronkramsey2009,
  title = {Bayesian {{Analysis}} of {{Radiocarbon Dates}}},
  author = {Bronk Ramsey, Christopher},
  year = 2009,
  journal = {Radiocarbon},
  volume = {51},
  number = {1},
  pages = {337--360},
  langid = {english}
}

@article{carleton2021,
  title = {Evaluating {{Bayesian Radiocarbon}}-dated {{Event Count}} ({{REC}}) Models for the Study of Long-term Human and Environmental Processes},
  author = {Carleton, W. Christopher},
  year = 2021,
  month = jan,
  journal = {Journal of Quaternary Science},
  volume = {36},
  number = {1},
  pages = {110--123},
  issn = {0267-8179, 1099-1417},
  doi = {10.1002/jqs.3256},
  langid = {english}
}

@article{galbraith1988,
  title = {Graphical {{Display}} of {{Estimates Having Differing Standard Errors}}},
  author = {Galbraith, Rex F.},
  year = 1988,
  month = aug,
  journal = {Technometrics},
  volume = {30},
  number = {3},
  pages = {271--281},
  issn = {0040-1706, 1537-2723},
  doi = {10.1080/00401706.1988.10488400},
  langid = {english}
}

@article{galbraith1990,
  title = {The Radial Plot: {{Graphical}} Assessment of Spread in Ages},
  shorttitle = {The Radial Plot},
  author = {Galbraith, Rex F.},
  year = 1990,
  month = jan,
  journal = {International Journal of Radiation Applications and Instrumentation. Part D. Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements},
  volume = {17},
  number = {3},
  pages = {207--214},
  issn = {13590189},
  doi = {10.1016/1359-0189(90)90036-W},
  langid = {english}
}

@article{galbraith1994,
  title = {Some {{Applications}} of {{Radial Plots}}},
  author = {Galbraith, Rex F.},
  year = 1994,
  month = dec,
  journal = {Journal of the American Statistical Association},
  volume = {89},
  number = {428},
  pages = {1232--1242},
  issn = {0162-1459, 1537-274X},
  doi = {10.1080/01621459.1994.10476864},
  langid = {english}
}

@article{heaton2020,
  title = {Marine20 {{The Marine Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curve}} (0--55,000 Cal {{BP}})},
  author = {Heaton, Timothy J and K{\"o}hler, Peter and Butzin, Martin and Bard, Edouard and Reimer, Ron W and Austin, William E N and Bronk Ramsey, Christopher and Grootes, Pieter M and Hughen, Konrad A and Kromer, Bernd and Reimer, Paula J and Adkins, Jess and Burke, Andrea and Cook, Mea S and Olsen, Jesper and Skinner, Luke C},
  year = 2020,
  month = aug,
  journal = {Radiocarbon},
  volume = {62},
  number = {4},
  pages = {779--820},
  issn = {0033-8222, 1945-5755},
  doi = {10.1017/RDC.2020.68},
  abstract = {The concentration of radiocarbon (14C) differs between ocean and atmosphere. Radiocarbon determinations from samples which obtained their 14C in the marine environment therefore need a marine-specific calibration curve and cannot be calibrated directly against the atmospheric-based IntCal20 curve. This paper presents Marine20, an update to the internationally agreed marine radiocarbon age calibration curve that provides a non-polar global-average marine record of radiocarbon from 0--55 cal kBP and serves as a baseline for regional oceanic variation. Marine20 is intended for calibration of marine radiocarbon samples from non-polar regions; it is not suitable for calibration in polar regions where variability in sea ice extent, ocean upwelling and air-sea gas exchange may have caused larger changes to concentrations of marine radiocarbon. The Marine20 curve is based upon 500 simulations with an ocean/atmosphere/biosphere box-model of the global carbon cycle that has been forced by posterior realizations of our Northern Hemispheric atmospheric IntCal20 14C curve and reconstructed changes in CO2 obtained from ice core data. These forcings enable us to incorporate carbon cycle dynamics and temporal changes in the atmospheric 14C level. The box-model simulations of the global-average marine radiocarbon reservoir age are similar to those of a more complex three-dimensional ocean general circulation model. However, simplicity and speed of the box model allow us to use a Monte Carlo approach to rigorously propagate the uncertainty in both the historic concentration of atmospheric 14C and other key parameters of the carbon cycle through to our final Marine20 calibration curve. This robust propagation of uncertainty is fundamental to providing reliable precision for the radiocarbon age calibration of marine based samples. We make a first step towards deconvolving the contributions of different processes to the total uncertainty; discuss the main differences of Marine20 from the previous age calibration curve Marine13; and identify the limitations of our approach together with key areas for further work. The updated values for {$\Delta$}R, the regional marine radiocarbon reservoir age corrections required to calibrate against Marine20, can be found at the data base http://calib.org/marine/.},
  langid = {english}
}

@article{hogg2013,
  title = {{{SHCal13 Southern Hemisphere Calibration}}, 0--50,000 {{Years}} Cal {{BP}}},
  author = {Hogg, Alan G and Hua, Quan and Blackwell, Paul G and Niu, Mu and Buck, Caitlin E and Guilderson, Thomas P and Heaton, Timothy J and Palmer, Jonathan G and Reimer, Paula J and Reimer, Ron W and Turney, Christian S M and Zimmerman, Susan R H},
  year = 2013,
  journal = {Radiocarbon},
  volume = {55},
  number = {4},
  pages = {1889--1903},
  issn = {0033-8222, 1945-5755},
  doi = {10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16783},
  abstract = {The Southern Hemisphere SHCal04 radiocarbon calibration curve has been updated with the addition of new data sets extending measurements to 2145 cal BP and including the ANSTO Younger Dryas Huon pine data set. Outside the range of measured data, the curve is based upon the ern Hemisphere data sets as presented in IntCal13, with an interhemispheric offset averaging 43 \textpm{} 23 yr modeled by an autoregressive process to represent the short-term correlations in the offset.},
  langid = {english}
}

@article{hogg2020,
  title = {{{SHCal20 Southern Hemisphere Calibration}}, 0--55,000 {{Years}} Cal {{BP}}},
  author = {Hogg, Alan G and Heaton, Timothy J and Hua, Quan and Palmer, Jonathan G and Turney, Chris SM and Southon, John and Bayliss, Alex and Blackwell, Paul G and Boswijk, Gretel and Bronk Ramsey, Christopher and Pearson, Charlotte and Petchey, Fiona and Reimer, Paula and Reimer, Ron and Wacker, Lukas},
  year = 2020,
  month = aug,
  journal = {Radiocarbon},
  volume = {62},
  number = {4},
  pages = {759--778},
  issn = {0033-8222, 1945-5755},
  doi = {10.1017/RDC.2020.59},
  abstract = {Early researchers of radiocarbon levels in Southern Hemisphere tree rings identified a variable North-South hemispheric offset, necessitating construction of a separate radiocarbon calibration curve for the South. We present here SHCal20, a revised calibration curve from 0--55,000 cal BP, based upon SHCal13 and fortified by the addition of 14 new tree-ring data sets in the 2140--0, 3520--3453, 3608--3590 and 13,140--11,375 cal BP time intervals. We detail the statistical approaches used for curve construction and present recommendations for the use of the Northern Hemisphere curve (IntCal20), the Southern Hemisphere curve (SHCal20) and suggest where application of an equal mixture of the curves might be more appropriate. Using our Bayesian spline with errors-in-variables methodology, and based upon a comparison of Southern Hemisphere tree-ring data compared with contemporaneous Northern Hemisphere data, we estimate the mean Southern Hemisphere offset to be 36 \textpm{} 27 14C yrs older.},
  langid = {english}
}

@article{hua2004,
  title = {Review of {{Tropospheric Bomb 14C Data}} for {{Carbon Cycle Modeling}} and {{Age Calibration Purposes}}},
  author = {Hua, Quan and Barbetti, Mike},
  year = 2004,
  journal = {Radiocarbon},
  volume = {46},
  number = {3},
  pages = {1273--1298},
  issn = {0033-8222, 1945-5755},
  doi = {10.1017/S0033822200033142},
  abstract = {Comprehensive published radiocarbon data from selected atmospheric records, tree rings, and recent organic matter were analyzed and grouped into 4 different zones (three for the Northern Hemisphere and one for the whole Southern Hemisphere). These 14C data for the summer season of each hemisphere were employed to construct zonal, hemispheric, and global data sets for use in regional and global carbon model calculations including calibrating and comparing carbon cycle models. In addition, extended monthly atmospheric 14C data sets for 4 different zones were compiled for age calibration purposes. This is the first time these data sets were constructed to facilitate the dating of recent organic material using the bomb 14C curves. The distribution of bomb 14C reflects the major zones of atmospheric circulation.},
  langid = {english}
}

@article{hua2013,
  title = {Atmospheric {{Radiocarbon}} for the {{Period}} 1950--2010},
  author = {Hua, Quan and Barbetti, Mike and Rakowski, Andrzej Z},
  year = 2013,
  journal = {Radiocarbon},
  volume = {55},
  number = {4},
  pages = {2059--2072},
  issn = {0033-8222, 1945-5755},
  doi = {10.2458/azu_js_rc.v55i2.16177},
  abstract = {We present a compilation of tropospheric 14CO2 for the period 1950--2010, based on published radiocarbon data from selected records of atmospheric CO2 sampling and tree-ring series. This compilation is a new version of the compilation by Hua and Barbetti (2004) and consists of yearly summer data sets for zonal, hemispheric, and global levels of atmospheric 14C. In addition, compiled (and extended) monthly data sets for 5 atmospheric zones (3 in the Northern Hemisphere and 2 in the Southern Hemisphere) are reported. The annual data sets are for use in regional and global carbon model calculations, while the extended monthly data sets serve as calibration curves for 14C dating of recent, short-lived terrestrial organic materials.},
  langid = {english}
}

@article{hua2022,
  title = {Atmospheric {{Radiocarbon}} for the {{Period}} 1950--2019},
  author = {Hua, Quan and Turnbull, Jocelyn C and Santos, Guaciara M and Rakowski, Andrzej Z and Ancapich{\'u}n, Santiago and {De Pol-Holz}, Ricardo and Hammer, Samuel and Lehman, Scott J and Levin, Ingeborg and Miller, John B and Palmer, Jonathan G and Turney, Chris S M},
  year = 2022,
  month = aug,
  journal = {Radiocarbon},
  volume = {64},
  number = {4},
  pages = {723--745},
  issn = {0033-8222, 1945-5755},
  doi = {10.1017/RDC.2021.95},
  abstract = {This paper presents a compilation of atmospheric radiocarbon for the period 1950--2019, derived from atmospheric CO2 sampling and tree rings from clean-air sites. Following the approach taken by Hua et al. (2013), our revised and extended compilation consists of zonal, hemispheric and global radiocarbon (14C) data sets, with monthly data sets for 5 zones (Northern Hemisphere zones 1, 2, and 3, and Southern Hemisphere zones 3 and 1--2). Our new compilation includes smooth curves for zonal data sets that are more suitable for dating applications than the previous approach based on simple averaging. Our new radiocarbon dataset is intended to help facilitate the use of atmospheric bomb 14C in carbon cycle studies and to accommodate increasing demand for accurate dating of recent (post-1950) terrestrial samples.},
  langid = {english}
}

@article{hughen2004,
  title = {{{14C Activity}} and {{Global Carbon Cycle Changes}} over the {{Past}} 50,000 {{Years}}},
  author = {Hughen, K. and Lehman, S. and Southon, J. and Overpeck, J. and Marchal, O. and Herring, C. and Turnbull, J.},
  year = 2004,
  month = jan,
  journal = {Science},
  volume = {303},
  number = {5655},
  pages = {202--207},
  issn = {0036-8075, 1095-9203},
  doi = {10.1126/science.1090300},
  abstract = {A series of 14C measurements in Ocean Drilling Program cores from the tropical Cariaco Basin, which have been correlated to the annual-layer counted chronology for the Greenland Ice Sheet Project 2 (GISP2) ice core, provides a high-resolution calibration of the radiocarbon time scale back to 50,000 years before the present. Independent radiometric dating of events correlated to GISP2 suggests that the calibration is accurate. Reconstructed 14C activities varied substantially during the last glacial period, including sharp peaks synchronous with the Laschamp and Mono Lake geomagnetic field intensity minimal and cosmogenic nuclide peaks in ice cores and marine sediments. Simulations with a geochemical box model suggest that much of the variability can be explained by geomagnetically modulated changes in 14C production rate together with plausible changes in deep-ocean ventilation and the global carbon cycle during glaciation.},
  langid = {english}
}

@article{hughen2004a,
  title = {Marine04 {{Marine Radiocarbon Age Calibration}}, 0--26 Cal Kyr {{BP}}},
  author = {Hughen, Konrad A and Baillie, Mike G L and Bard, Edouard and Warren Beck, J and Bertrand, Chanda J H and Blackwell, Paul G and Buck, Caitlin E and Burr, George S and Cutler, Kirsten B and Damon, Paul E and Edwards, Richard L and Fairbanks, Richard G and Friedrich, Michael and Guilderson, Thomas P and Kromer, Bernd and McCormac, Gerry and Manning, Sturt and Bronk Ramsey, Christopher and Reimer, Paula J and Reimer, Ron W and Remmele, Sabine and Southon, John R and Stuiver, Minze and Talamo, Sahra and Taylor, F W and {van der Plicht}, Johannes and Weyhenmeyer, Constanze E},
  year = 2004,
  journal = {Radiocarbon},
  volume = {46},
  number = {3},
  pages = {1059--1086},
  issn = {0033-8222, 1945-5755},
  doi = {10.1017/S0033822200033002},
  abstract = {New radiocarbon calibration curves, IntCal04 and Marine04, have been constructed and internationally ratified to replace the terrestrial and marine components of IntCal98. The new calibration data sets extend an additional 2000 yr, from 0--26 cal kyr BP (Before Present, 0 cal BP = AD 1950), and provide much higher resolution, greater precision, and more detailed structure than IntCal98. For the Marine04 curve, dendrochronologically-dated tree-ring samples, converted with a box diffusion model to marine mixed-layer ages, cover the period from 0--10.5 cal kyr BP. Beyond 10.5 cal kyr BP, high-resolution marine data become available from foraminifera in varved sediments and U/Th-dated corals. The marine records are corrected with site-specific 14C reservoir age information to provide a single global marine mixed-layer calibration from 10.5--26.0 cal kyr BP. A substantial enhancement relative to IntCal98 is the introduction of a random walk model, which takes into account the uncertainty in both the calendar age and the 14C age to calculate the underlying calibration curve (Buck and Blackwell, this issue). The marine data sets and calibration curve for marine samples from the surface mixed layer (Marine04) are discussed here. The tree-ring data sets, sources of uncertainty, and regional offsets are presented in detail in a companion paper by Reimer et al. (this issue).},
  langid = {english}
}

@article{hyndman1996,
  title = {Computing and {{Graphing Highest Density Regions}}},
  author = {Hyndman, Rob J.},
  year = 1996,
  month = may,
  journal = {The American Statistician},
  volume = {50},
  number = {2},
  pages = {120},
  issn = {00031305},
  doi = {10.2307/2684423},
  langid = {english}
}

@article{kueppers2004,
  title = {Dead Wood Biomass and Turnover Time, Measured by Radiocarbon, along a Subalpine Elevation Gradient},
  author = {Kueppers, Lara M. and Southon, John and Baer, Paul and Harte, John},
  year = 2004,
  month = dec,
  journal = {Oecologia},
  volume = {141},
  number = {4},
  pages = {641--651},
  issn = {0029-8549, 1432-1939},
  doi = {10.1007/s00442-004-1689-x},
  langid = {english}
}

@article{mccormac2004,
  title = {Shcal04 {{Southern Hemisphere Calibration}}, 0--11.0 Cal Kyr {{BP}}},
  author = {McCormac, F G and Hogg, A G and Blackwell, P G and Buck, C E and Higham, T F G and Reimer, P J},
  year = 2004,
  journal = {Radiocarbon},
  volume = {46},
  number = {3},
  pages = {1087--1092},
  issn = {0033-8222, 1945-5755},
  doi = {10.1017/S0033822200033014},
  abstract = {Recent measurements on dendrochronologically-dated wood from the Southern Hemisphere have shown that there are differences between the structural form of the radiocarbon calibration curves from each hemisphere. Thus, it is desirable, when possible, to use calibration data obtained from secure dendrochronologically-dated wood from the corresponding hemisphere. In this paper, we outline the recent work and point the reader to the internationally recommended data set that should be used for future calibration of Southern Hemisphere 14C dates.},
  langid = {english}
}

@article{millard2014,
  title = {Conventions for {{Reporting Radiocarbon Determinations}}},
  author = {Millard, Andrew R},
  year = 2014,
  journal = {Radiocarbon},
  volume = {56},
  number = {2},
  pages = {555--559},
  issn = {0033-8222, 1945-5755},
  doi = {10.2458/56.17455},
  langid = {english}
}

@article{reimer2004,
  title = {Intcal04 {{Terrestrial Radiocarbon Age Calibration}}, 0--26 Cal Kyr {{BP}}},
  author = {Reimer, Paula J and Baillie, Mike G L and Bard, Edouard and Bayliss, Alex and Beck, J Warren and Bertrand, Chanda J H and Blackwell, Paul G and Buck, Caitlin E and Burr, George S and Cutler, Kirsten B and Damon, Paul E and Edwards, R Lawrence and Fairbanks, Richard G and Friedrich, Michael and Guilderson, Thomas P and Hogg, Alan G and Konrad, A. Hughen and Kromer, Bernd and McCormac, Gerry and Manning, Sturt and Bronk Ramsey, Christopher and Reimer, Ron W and Remmele, Sabine and Southon, John R and Stuiver, Minze and Talamo, Sahra and Taylor, F W and {van der Plicht}, Johannes and Weyhenmeyer, Constanze E},
  year = 2004,
  journal = {Radiocarbon},
  volume = {46},
  number = {3},
  pages = {1029--1058},
  issn = {0033-8222, 1945-5755},
  doi = {10.1017/S0033822200032999},
  abstract = {A new calibration curve for the conversion of radiocarbon ages to calibrated (cal) ages has been constructed and internationally ratified to replace IntCal98, which extended from 0--24 cal kyr BP (Before Present, 0 cal BP = AD 1950). The new calibration data set for terrestrial samples extends from 0--26 cal kyr BP, but with much higher resolution beyond 11.4 cal kyr BP than IntCal98. Dendrochronologically-dated tree-ring samples cover the period from 0--12.4 cal kyr BP. Beyond the end of the tree rings, data from marine records (corals and foraminifera) are converted to the atmospheric equivalent with a site-specific marine reservoir correction to provide terrestrial calibration from 12.4--26.0 cal kyr B P. A substantial enhancement relative to IntCal98 is the introduction of a coherent statistical approach based on a random walk model, which takes into account the uncertainty in both the calendar age and the 14C age to calculate the underlying calibration curve (Buck and Blackwell, this issue). The tree-ring data sets, sources of uncertainty, and regional offsets are discussed here. The marine data sets and calibration curve for marine samples from the surface mixed layer (Marine04) are discussed in brief, but details are presented in Hughen et al. (this issue a). We do not make a recommendation for calibration beyond 26 cal kyr BP at this time; however, potential calibration data sets are compared in another paper (van der Plicht et al., this issue).},
  langid = {english}
}

@article{reimer2009,
  title = {{{IntCal09}} and {{Marine09 Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curves}}, 0--50,000 {{Years}} Cal {{BP}}},
  author = {Reimer, P J and Baillie, M G L and Bard, E and Bayliss, A and Beck, J W and Blackwell, P G and Bronk Ramsey, C and Buck, C E and Burr, G S and Edwards, R L and Friedrich, M and Grootes, P M and Guilderson, T P and Hajdas, I and Heaton, T J and Hogg, A G and Hughen, K A and Kaiser, K F and Kromer, B and McCormac, F G and Manning, S W and Reimer, R W and Richards, D A and Southon, J R and Talamo, S and Turney, C S M and {van der Plicht}, J and Weyhenmeyer, C E},
  year = 2009,
  journal = {Radiocarbon},
  volume = {51},
  number = {4},
  pages = {1111--1150},
  issn = {0033-8222, 1945-5755},
  doi = {10.1017/S0033822200034202},
  abstract = {The IntCal04 and Marine04 radiocarbon calibration curves have been updated from 12 cal kBP (cal kBP is here defined as thousands of calibrated years before AD 1950), and extended to 50 cal kBP, utilizing newly available data sets that meet the IntCal Working Group criteria for pristine corals and other carbonates and for quantification of uncertainty in both the 14C and calendar timescales as established in 2002. No change was made to the curves from 0--12 cal kBP. The curves were constructed using a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) implementation of the random walk model used for IntCal04 and Marine04. The new curves were ratified at the 20th International Radiocarbon Conference in June 2009 and are available in the Supplemental Material at www.radiocarbon.org.},
  langid = {english}
}

@article{reimer2013,
  title = {{{IntCal13}} and {{Marine13 Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curves}} 0--50,000 {{Years}} Cal {{BP}}},
  author = {Reimer, Paula J and Bard, Edouard and Bayliss, Alex and Beck, J Warren and Blackwell, Paul G and Ramsey, Christopher Bronk and Buck, Caitlin E and Cheng, Hai and Edwards, R Lawrence and Friedrich, Michael and Grootes, Pieter M and Guilderson, Thomas P and Haflidason, Haflidi and Hajdas, Irka and Hatt{\'e}, Christine and Heaton, Timothy J and Hoffmann, Dirk L and Hogg, Alan G and Hughen, Konrad A and Kaiser, K Felix and Kromer, Bernd and Manning, Sturt W and Niu, Mu and Reimer, Ron W and Richards, David A and Scott, E Marian and Southon, John R and Staff, Richard A and Turney, Christian S M and {van der Plicht}, Johannes},
  year = 2013,
  journal = {Radiocarbon},
  volume = {55},
  number = {4},
  pages = {1869--1887},
  issn = {0033-8222, 1945-5755},
  doi = {10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16947},
  abstract = {The IntCal09 and Marine09 radiocarbon calibration curves have been revised utilizing newly available and updated data sets from 14C measurements on tree rings, plant macrofossils, speleothems, corals, and foraminifera. The calibration curves were derived from the data using the random walk model (RWM) used to generate IntCal09 and Marine09, which has been revised to account for additional uncertainties and error structures. The new curves were ratified at the 21st International Radiocarbon conference in July 2012 and are available as Supplemental Material at www.radiocarbon.org. The database can be accessed at http://intcal.qub.ac.uk/intcal13/.},
  langid = {english}
}

@article{reimer2020,
  title = {The {{IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curve}} (0--55 Cal {{kBP}})},
  author = {Reimer, Paula J and Austin, William E N and Bard, Edouard and Bayliss, Alex and Blackwell, Paul G and Bronk Ramsey, Christopher and Butzin, Martin and Cheng, Hai and Edwards, R Lawrence and Friedrich, Michael and Grootes, Pieter M and Guilderson, Thomas P and Hajdas, Irka and Heaton, Timothy J and Hogg, Alan G and Hughen, Konrad A and Kromer, Bernd and Manning, Sturt W and Muscheler, Raimund and Palmer, Jonathan G and Pearson, Charlotte and {van der Plicht}, Johannes and Reimer, Ron W and Richards, David A and Scott, E Marian and Southon, John R and Turney, Christian S M and Wacker, Lukas and Adolphi, Florian and B{\"u}ntgen, Ulf and Capano, Manuela and Fahrni, Simon M and {Fogtmann-Schulz}, Alexandra and Friedrich, Ronny and K{\"o}hler, Peter and Kudsk, Sabrina and Miyake, Fusa and Olsen, Jesper and Reinig, Frederick and Sakamoto, Minoru and Sookdeo, Adam and Talamo, Sahra},
  year = 2020,
  month = aug,
  journal = {Radiocarbon},
  volume = {62},
  number = {4},
  pages = {725--757},
  issn = {0033-8222, 1945-5755},
  doi = {10.1017/RDC.2020.41},
  abstract = {Radiocarbon (14C) ages cannot provide absolutely dated chronologies for archaeological or paleoenvironmental studies directly but must be converted to calendar age equivalents using a calibration curve compensating for fluctuations in atmospheric 14C concentration. Although calibration curves are constructed from independently dated archives, they invariably require revision as new data become available and our understanding of the Earth system improves. In this volume the international 14C calibration curves for both the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, as well as for the ocean surface layer, have been updated to include a wealth of new data and extended to 55,000 cal BP. Based on tree rings, IntCal20 now extends as a fully atmospheric record to ca. 13,900 cal BP. For the older part of the timescale, IntCal20 comprises statistically integrated evidence from floating tree-ring chronologies, lacustrine and marine sediments, speleothems, and corals. We utilized improved evaluation of the timescales and location variable 14C offsets from the atmosphere (reservoir age, dead carbon fraction) for each dataset. New statistical methods have refined the structure of the calibration curves while maintaining a robust treatment of uncertainties in the 14C ages, the calendar ages and other corrections. The inclusion of modeled marine reservoir ages derived from a three-dimensional ocean circulation model has allowed us to apply more appropriate reservoir corrections to the marine 14C data rather than the previous use of constant regional offsets from the atmosphere. Here we provide an overview of the new and revised datasets and the associated methods used for the construction of the IntCal20 curve and explore potential regional offsets for tree-ring data. We discuss the main differences with respect to the previous calibration curve, IntCal13, and some of the implications for archaeology and geosciences ranging from the recent past to the time of the extinction of the Neanderthals.},
  langid = {english}
}

@article{stuiver1977,
  title = {Discussion {{Reporting}} of {{14C Data}}},
  author = {Stuiver, Minze and Polach, Henry A.},
  year = 1977,
  journal = {Radiocarbon},
  volume = {19},
  number = {3},
  pages = {355--363},
  issn = {0033-8222, 1945-5755},
  doi = {10.1017/S0033822200003672},
  abstract = {Count rates, representing the rate of 14C decay, are the basic data obtained in a 14C laboratory. The conversion of this information into an age or geochemical parameters appears a simple matter at first. However, the path between counting and suitable 14C data reporting (table 1) causes headaches to many. Minor deflections in pathway, depending on personal interpretations, are possible and give end results that are not always useful for inter-laboratory comparisons. This discussion is an attempt to identify some of these problems and to recommend certain procedures by which reporting ambiguities can be avoided.},
  langid = {english}
}

@article{stuiver1998,
  title = {{{INTCAL98 Radiocarbon Age Calibration}}, 24,000--0 Cal {{BP}}},
  author = {Stuiver, Minze and Reimer, Paula J. and Bard, Edouard and Beck, J. Warren and Burr, G. S. and Hughen, Konrad A. and Kromer, Bernd and McCormac, Gerry and {van der Plicht}, Johannes and Spurk, Marco},
  year = 1998,
  journal = {Radiocarbon},
  volume = {40},
  number = {3},
  pages = {1041--1083},
  issn = {0033-8222, 1945-5755},
  doi = {10.1017/S0033822200019123},
  abstract = {The focus of this paper is the conversion of radiocarbon ages to calibrated (cal) ages for the interval 24,000--0 cal BP (Before Present, 0 cal BP = AD 1950), based upon a sample set of dendrochronologically dated tree rings, uranium-thorium dated corals, and varve-counted marine sediment. The 14C age-cal age information, produced by many laboratories, is converted to {$\Delta$}14C profiles and calibration curves, for the atmosphere as well as the oceans. We discuss offsets in measured 14C ages and the errors therein, regional 14C age differences, tree-coral 14C age comparisons and the time dependence of marine reservoir ages, and evaluate decadal vs. single-year 14C results. Changes in oceanic deepwater circulation, especially for the 16,000-11,000 cal BP interval, are reflected in the {$\Delta$}14C values of INTCAL98.},
  langid = {english}
}

@article{stuiver1998a,
  title = {High-{{Precision Radiocarbon Age Calibration}} for {{Terrestrial}} and {{Marine Samples}}},
  author = {Stuiver, Minze and Reimer, Paula J. and Braziunas, Thomas F.},
  year = 1998,
  journal = {Radiocarbon},
  volume = {40},
  number = {3},
  pages = {1127--1151},
  issn = {0033-8222, 1945-5755},
  doi = {10.1017/S0033822200019172},
  abstract = {Single-year and decadal radiocarbon tree-ring ages are tabulated and discussed in terms of 14C age calibration. The single-year data form the basis of a detailed 14C age calibration curve for the cal ad 1510--1954 interval (``cal'' denotes calibrated). The Seattle decadal data set (back to 11,617 cal BP, with 0 BP = ad 1950) is a component of the integrated decadal INTCAL98 14C age curve (Stuiver et al. 1998). Atmospheric 14C ages can be transformed into 14C ages of the global ocean using a carbon reservoir model. INTCAL98 14C ages, used for these calculations, yield global ocean 14C ages differing slightly from previously published ones (Stuiver and Braziunas 1993b). We include discussions of offsets, error multipliers, regional 14C age differences and marine 14C age response to oceanic and atmospheric forcing.},
  langid = {english}
}

@article{vanderplicht2006,
  title = {A Note on Reporting Radiocarbon},
  author = {{van der Plicht}, J and Hogg, A},
  year = 2006,
  month = dec,
  journal = {Quaternary Geochronology},
  volume = {1},
  number = {4},
  pages = {237--240},
  issn = {18711014},
  doi = {10.1016/j.quageo.2006.07.001},
  langid = {english}
}

@article{ward1978,
  title = {Procedures for {{Comparing}} and {{Combining Radiocarbon Age Determinations}}: {{A Critique}}},
  shorttitle = {Procedures for {{Comparing}} and {{Combining Radiocarbon Age Determinations}}},
  author = {Ward, G. K. and Wilson, S. R.},
  year = 1978,
  month = feb,
  journal = {Archaeometry},
  volume = {20},
  number = {1},
  pages = {19--31},
  issn = {0003-813X, 1475-4754},
  doi = {10.1111/j.1475-4754.1978.tb00208.x},
  langid = {english}
}
